Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    How to Pick a Good Butternut Squash (and Keep It Fresh)

    October 24, 2026

    NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI

    October 24, 2026

    10 Frequently Asked Questions About Claude

    October 24, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • How to Pick a Good Butternut Squash (and Keep It Fresh)
    • NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI
    • 10 Frequently Asked Questions About Claude
    • Trump Floats New Names For Atlantic, Says He’s ‘Just Kidding’ — Then Adds A Caveat
    • Robinhood (HOOD) sees surge in Bitcoin (BTC), Gold prediction markets as traders move beyond sports
    • Trump Official Britt McHenry Caught On Video Appearing To Throw Beer At Fan During NBA Game
    • A Garage Cleanout That Actually Gets Finished
    • ADHD Medication Could Slash Death Risk, Huge Study Finds
    Facebook X (Twitter)
    SBM Global News
    Demo
    • Home
    • Top Stories
      • Politics
    • Business
      • Small Business
      • Marketing
    • Finance
      • Investment
    • Technology

      10 Frequently Asked Questions About Claude

      October 24, 2026
      Read More

      Agent cloud startup Daytona hits $1B valuation backed by FirstMark and a who’s who of angels

      October 24, 2026
      Read More

      Tesla says it will start selling Cybercabs by end of year

      October 22, 2026
      Read More

      Eric Schmidt reportedly owns about half as much of Anthropic as CEO Dario Amodei

      October 21, 2026
      Read More

      Vaden Consultancy – Company Profile

      October 20, 2026
      Read More
    • Lifestyle
      • Travel
    • Feel Good
    • Get In Touch
    SBM Global News
    Demo
    Home»Politics»Live Updates: Supreme Court Hears Trump’s Claim to ‘Absolute Immunity’
    Politics

    Live Updates: Supreme Court Hears Trump’s Claim to ‘Absolute Immunity’

    By Staff WriterApril 26, 20244 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit Email
    #image_title
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Former President Donald J. Trump’s claim that former presidents must enjoy “complete immunity” from prosecution for any crimes they committed in office would significantly expand the temporary immunity that sitting presidents already have.

    Nothing in the Constitution or federal statutes says that presidents are shielded from being prosecuted while in office, and no court has ever ruled that way. But political appointees in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, whose interpretations are binding on the executive branch, have declared that the Constitution implicitly establishes such immunity.

    This argument boils down to practicalities of governance: The stigma of being indicted and the burden of a trial would unduly interfere with a president’s ability to carry out his duties, Robert G. Dixon Jr., then the head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, wrote in a memo in September 1973. This would prevent the executive branch “from accomplishing its constitutional functions” in a way that cannot “be justified by an overriding need,” he added.

    Mr. Dixon, an appointee of President Richard M. Nixon, wrote his memo against the backdrop of the Watergate scandal, when Mr. Nixon faced a criminal investigation by a special counsel, Archibald Cox. The next month, Nixon’s solicitor general, Robert H. Bork, in a court brief, similarly argued for an “inference” that the Constitution makes sitting presidents immune from indictment and trial.

    (That same month, Mr. Nixon had Mr. Cox fired in the so-called Saturday Night Massacre. Mr. Nixon’s attorney general and deputy attorney general resigned rather than carry out his orders to oust the prosecutor; Mr. Nixon then turned to Mr. Bork, the department’s No. 3, who proved willing to do it. Amid a political backlash, Mr. Nixon was forced to allow a new special counsel, Leon Jaworski, to resume the investigation.)

    The question arose again a generation later, when President Bill Clinton faced an investigation by Kenneth Starr, an independent counsel, into the Whitewater land deal that morphed into an inquiry into his affair with Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern. Randolph D. Moss, Mr. Clinton’s appointee to lead the Office of Legal Counsel, reviewed the Justice Department’s 1973 opinions and reaffirmed their conclusions.

    Legal scholars, as well as staff for prosecutors investigating presidents, have disputed the legitimacy of that constitutional theory. In 1974, Mr. Jaworski received a memo from his staff saying he could, in fact, indict Mr. Nixon while he was in office, and he later made that case in a court brief.

    And in a 56-page memo in 1998, Ronald Rotunda, a prominent conservative constitutional scholar whom Mr. Starr hired as a consultant on his legal team, rejected the view that presidents are immune from prosecution while in office. Mr. Starr later said that he had concluded that he could indict Mr. Clinton.

    “It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” Mr. Rotunda wrote. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”

    Mr. Starr commissioned the Rotunda memo as he was drafting a potential indictment of Mr. Clinton, and Mr. Starr decided that he could charge the president while in office. In the end, however, both Mr. Jaworski and Mr. Starr decided to let congressional impeachment proceedings play out and did not try to bring indictments while Mr. Nixon and Mr. Clinton remained in office.

    The question may never be definitively tested in the courts. In 1999, Congress allowed a law that created independent counsels like Mr. Starr — prosecutors who do not report to the attorney general — to expire, and the Justice Department issued regulations to allow for the appointment of semiautonomous special counsels for inquiries into potential high-level wrongdoing in the executive branch.

    Special counsels are, however, bound by Justice Departments policies and practices — including the Office of Legal Counsel’s proclamation that sitting presidents are temporarily immune from criminal indictment or trial.

    View original article here

    Demo
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Reddit
    Previous ArticleHonda Commits to E.V.s With Big Investment in Canada
    Next Article Successful start-up founders’ advice for aspiring entrepreneurs

    Related Posts

    Trump Floats New Names For Atlantic, Says He’s ‘Just Kidding’ — Then Adds A Caveat

    October 24, 2026
    Read More

    Trump Official Britt McHenry Caught On Video Appearing To Throw Beer At Fan During NBA Game

    October 24, 2026
    Read More

    Bernie Sanders Trolls Trump’s New Anti-Fraud Program With A Damning Tip Of His Own

    October 23, 2026
    Read More
    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Top Posts

    Former FBI, CIA Head Has ‘Serious Concerns’ With Trump Cabinet Picks

    December 28, 2024435

    Emirates to operate next-gen A350 on the third daily service to Cape Town

    January 14, 2026256

    AAVE Price Prediction: Target $215-225 by Mid-January 2025 as Technical Indicators Signal Bullish Momentum

    December 15, 2025240

    Wall Street Slumps As Alphabet, Qualcomm And Other Tech Stocks Fall

    February 7, 2026212
    Don't Miss
    Lifestyle

    How to Pick a Good Butternut Squash (and Keep It Fresh)

    By Staff WriterOctober 24, 20269 Mins Read

    Butternut squash looks the same on every grocery shelf, which makes it tricky to know…

    Read More

    NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI

    October 24, 2026

    10 Frequently Asked Questions About Claude

    October 24, 2026

    Trump Floats New Names For Atlantic, Says He’s ‘Just Kidding’ — Then Adds A Caveat

    October 24, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Demo
    Find More
    Trending News
    • How to Pick a Good Butternut Squash (and Keep It Fresh)
    • NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI
    • 10 Frequently Asked Questions About Claude
    • Trump Floats New Names For Atlantic, Says He’s ‘Just Kidding’ — Then Adds A Caveat
    • Robinhood (HOOD) sees surge in Bitcoin (BTC), Gold prediction markets as traders move beyond sports
    • Trump Official Britt McHenry Caught On Video Appearing To Throw Beer At Fan During NBA Game
    • A Garage Cleanout That Actually Gets Finished
    • ADHD Medication Could Slash Death Risk, Huge Study Finds
    • Moz & Profound Partner to Connect SEO and AI Visibility
    • Agent cloud startup Daytona hits $1B valuation backed by FirstMark and a who’s who of angels
    Other News
    • Business
    • Feel Good
    • Finance
    • Fitness
    • Health
    • Investment
    • Lifestyle
    • Marketing
    • Politics
    • Small Business
    • Technology
    • Top Stories
    • Travel
    About Us

    Small Business Minder brings together business and related news from around the world in one place. Follow us for all the business news you'll need.

    Facebook X (Twitter)
    Our Picks

    How to Pick a Good Butternut Squash (and Keep It Fresh)

    October 24, 2026

    NVIDIA, AMD or Apple? How to Choose the Right One For Local AI

    October 24, 2026
    Most Popular

    Former FBI, CIA Head Has ‘Serious Concerns’ With Trump Cabinet Picks

    December 28, 2024435

    Emirates to operate next-gen A350 on the third daily service to Cape Town

    January 14, 2026256
    Categories
    © 2026 Small Business Minder
    • Home
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. To get the most from our site, please disable your Ad Blocker.