Hi Scott,
I’ve heard some talk lately (a lot more than the normal conspiracy theories) around the removal of coins and then notes from the Australian monetary system – moving Australia to a completely cashless society. The discussion between Linfox, the Government and the banks all revolves around how expensive it is to ‘move’ coins around the country for regional post offices, banks, corner shops, etc. The proposal is that the $1 and $2 coins will become notes again to reduce weight, and that later notes themselves will go. This whole concept is so very scary. It would mean a lot more traceability of payments and business transactions – and the ATO would see everything!
Lyn
Hi Lyn
It’s always puzzled me why paying for something with cash doesn’t carry a surcharge like cards do.
After all, there’s a huge cost to taking cash: think of the shopkeepers who have to walk to a bank holding more money than a homie in a rap video. Or Armaguard, who have two pistol-packing blokes driving around in an armoured tank.
Now the truth is that we basically already live in a cashless society: according to the Australian Banking Association, cash is being used for less than 13% of payments, and it’s sure to continue dropping in the future.
So we’ll get rid of cash?
I don’t think so, as much as the ATO would love it.
A good case study is Norway, which is the world’s most cashless country, with only 2% of payments being made with cash. Yet Norway is currently legislating the right for its citizens to continue paying with cash to ensure that they are “prepared for emergencies” (like when the artificial intelligence robots shut down our digital payment systems and have us dance like monkeys for their entertainment).
While I don’t see an end for cash, I do see a future where there is a surcharge on paying with cash.
Scott.